<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-campbell, Anti-creationist, anti-dumb people.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/im-bout-to-cumulatively-grow-all-up-in-this-mug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/im-bout-to-cumulatively-grow-all-up-in-this-mug/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: messiahsimple</title>
		<link>http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/im-bout-to-cumulatively-grow-all-up-in-this-mug/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>messiahsimple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-5</guid>
		<description>That was definitely what I was going for.  It&#039;s academic masturbation to try and say that all creators have created the SAME story over and over, and YOU have figured it out.  

It&#039;s really no more complicated than someone saying, &quot;look, every story ever written has a figure, and that figure has to do something, then he does something, and then he&#039;s done doing it.&quot;  

Only we have to throw in the post hoc christ figure anytime anyone suffers/sacrifices/saves/dies, and use the word denouement because the working class doesn&#039;t understand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was definitely what I was going for.  It&#8217;s academic masturbation to try and say that all creators have created the SAME story over and over, and YOU have figured it out.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really no more complicated than someone saying, &#8220;look, every story ever written has a figure, and that figure has to do something, then he does something, and then he&#8217;s done doing it.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Only we have to throw in the post hoc christ figure anytime anyone suffers/sacrifices/saves/dies, and use the word denouement because the working class doesn&#8217;t understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stef</title>
		<link>http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/im-bout-to-cumulatively-grow-all-up-in-this-mug/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>stef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I kind of agree, I think

if I got what you are saying, cause it cann be a bit hard to understand.


I hate it when people say &quot;you can&#039;t be original, since everything has been done before&quot; (about video games), or when people say that&quot; there are only 10 or so stories&quot;, and that &quot;every story made is essentially 1 of those 10&quot;.
they really know shit when they say stuff like that,
that &#039;story&#039; isn&#039;t the &quot;essence&quot; of the story,
it&#039;s just the basic plot,
the &quot;feeling&quot; (or whatever I&#039;m supposed to call it) is the essence of the story.


but I dunno, it seemed to me like you meant kind of the same thing,
at least it&#039;s what I understand from the first part of what you were saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of agree, I think</p>
<p>if I got what you are saying, cause it cann be a bit hard to understand.</p>
<p>I hate it when people say &#8220;you can&#8217;t be original, since everything has been done before&#8221; (about video games), or when people say that&#8221; there are only 10 or so stories&#8221;, and that &#8220;every story made is essentially 1 of those 10&#8243;.<br />
they really know shit when they say stuff like that,<br />
that &#8217;story&#8217; isn&#8217;t the &#8220;essence&#8221; of the story,<br />
it&#8217;s just the basic plot,<br />
the &#8220;feeling&#8221; (or whatever I&#8217;m supposed to call it) is the essence of the story.</p>
<p>but I dunno, it seemed to me like you meant kind of the same thing,<br />
at least it&#8217;s what I understand from the first part of what you were saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: percyflage</title>
		<link>http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/im-bout-to-cumulatively-grow-all-up-in-this-mug/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>percyflage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-3</guid>
		<description>As food for thought, you might want to read Teilhard de Chardin&#039;s &quot;The Phenomenon of Man&quot;.  It is a compelling attempt to reconcile science and philosophy, a subject which you seem to be interested in, considering your commentary on life&#039;s &quot;cumulative growth&quot; and &quot;journeying&quot;.
Best,
Kimberlee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As food for thought, you might want to read Teilhard de Chardin&#8217;s &#8220;The Phenomenon of Man&#8221;.  It is a compelling attempt to reconcile science and philosophy, a subject which you seem to be interested in, considering your commentary on life&#8217;s &#8220;cumulative growth&#8221; and &#8220;journeying&#8221;.<br />
Best,<br />
Kimberlee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: machaque</title>
		<link>http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/im-bout-to-cumulatively-grow-all-up-in-this-mug/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>machaque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omnicommentary.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-2</guid>
		<description>U r t3h n00bZzoRz!!1oneooneeleven!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U r t3h n00bZzoRz!!1oneooneeleven!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
